|
By Arild Hoksnes
Gemini, 1998,
Vol. 11, No. 1
Used by permission.
Translation by Ruth Marie Sylte
It is possible that the hardingfele (Hardanger fiddle) may be
more Norwegian than we had previously thought. An important
joint project, which attempts to date old instruments, is currently
winding up. Both humanities-focused and technological dating methods
are being used to determine the age of old fiddles and fiddle boxes.
So far the results are indicating that the Hardanger fiddle may
be a result of an older Norwegian fiddle-making tradition, and
not simply the result of influences from Europe in the 1700s.
 |
| Knut Buen, one today's finest hardingfele spelemenn
(Hardanger fiddle players). Photo by Scan Foto |
How old is the hardingfele? And how did it come into being? For
a long time, researchers have been in agreement that it originates
from the mid-1700s. And the theory has been raised that the hardingfele
is a Norwegian variation of a violin made in a style of European
instruments in the 1700s, when it was popular to put resonating understrings
on violins.
A Tradition from the Middle Ages?
At the same time, music researchers have puzzled over the fact that
there is no documentation proving that the hardingfele is older (than
the 1700s). This is particularly perplexing because so much of the
fiddle music has been proven be older than that. So the exciting
question is: Could the hardingfele possibly be a development of an
old Norwegian fiddle perhaps back to the "fidel" which is
mentioned and depicted in the Middle Ages?
A fiddle with a makers mark of 1651, the so-called "Jaastad fiddle" from
Hardanger, has long been a mystery for music researchers. It has
been considered as the oldest existing hardingfele, but nobody has
been able to produce evidence that this dating is correct. And especially
perplexing is the fact that there are practically no fiddles in existence
which date any earlier than the 1750s. Why, therefore, should a single
hardingfele from 100 years earlier suddenly appear?
 |
|
The oldest dated fiddle we have
is the "Jaastad fiddle", which was probably made
by Ole Jonsen Jaastad in Hardanger. But is the dating of
1651 reliable? Photo by the Hardanger Fiddle Project.
|
Some historians who have grappled with this issue indicate the possibility
that the pietistic Danish king, Christian VI (1699-1746), may have
negatively influenced the extent of fiddle-making during that one
hundred year period and indirectly caused the burning of fiddles.
If this is the case, how can it be that fiddle maker Trond Isaksen
Flatabø from Hardanger, who was known to have built around
1000 fiddles, was the wealthiest man in Hardanger when he died in
1772? What sort of demand for this instrument could have made him
as rich as Croesus? A production of that magnitude could not possibly
have been a "flash in the pan."
C14 and Dendrochronological Analysis
Three C14 analyses carried out under the supervision of Steinar
Gulliksen at the Radiological Dating Laboratory of the Norwegian
University of Science and Technoglogy (Norges
Teknisk Natursvitenskapelige Universitetet, also known as NTNU) in Trondheim also places the Jaastad
fiddle in the correct period. However, among other things,
because only very small samples can be taken from such an instrument,
the margin of error for measurement is so great that it is difficult
to give a final indication that the dating of 1651 is correct.
Another possibility is a tree-ring (dendrochronological) analysis.
Terje Thun, a research assistant at NTNUs Botanical Institute,
has tried to analyze the Jaastad fiddle with the help of photographs
of the fiddle. "Reading tree-rings from photographs seems to work
well, and that is, in itself, an exiting development of the method," says
Thun.
Lack of Reference
The problem is that there is no reference chart for the growth of
pine trees in western Norway after 1600.
Analysis shows that the pinewood of which the fiddle was made was
cut and bundled before 1600. But now a chart must be made that will
document the growth of western Norways pine trees after 1600.
Thun waits for permission to take samples from the 17th century
buildings of western Norway now located at the Norwegian Folk Museum.,
which can give him the needed reference point. By the end of the
year will he be able to give a more definitive answer about the dating
of Norways oldest hardingfele.
On the Trail of an Unknown Tradition
The leader of the project, Bjørn Aksdal at the Council for
Folk Music and Folk Dance (Rådet for Folkemusikk og Folkedans),
also known as RFF-Sentret, at NTNU, says that a wide range of disciplines
have been used to test the dating of the Jaastad fiddle and other
old Norwegian fiddles.
 |
| This fiddle box from Voss has the
inscription of "1512". Both dendrochronological and
C14 analysis support this dating as correct. The box fits perfectly
to a fiddle of the Jaastad style. Photo by the Hardanger Fiddle
Project. |
"Art historians, historians, handwriting experts and fiddlemakers
have evaluated the instruments from many angles. Connections between
the humanities, natural science methods and the knowledge of craftsmanship
from (modern) fiddle makers Sigvald Rørlien and Olav Vindal,
have brought the Hardanger Fiddle Project many exciting dimensions," he
says.
But Aksdal is of the opinion that there are other, and perhaps even
more important, clues that point to the possibility that the hardingfele
is older and more Norwegian than we had believed.
"One of the clues is a fiddle box from Voss, bearing the inscription "1512".
The box has room for a relatively small fiddle, something that is
typical for the oldest preserved fiddles.. And the dendrochronological
analysis used seems to indicate that the box was made late in the
first decade of the 1500s, probably earlier," says Aksdal.
"What we have found so far has not contraindicated that the Jaastad
fiddle is from the 1600s and we have also found a fiddle box from
the 1500s, made for what we believe would be a typical old Norwegian
fiddle. We feel that we are "getting warm" in the search
for an older Norwegian fiddlemaking tradition with which we were
not previously acquainted," says Aksdal.
Arild Hoknes is a researcher and fiddler from Norway. He is
the former editor of Spelemannsbladet, the journal of Landslaget
for Spelemenn.
_______________________________________________
|